Posts Tagged ‘ASCH’

Gearing Up for Our First International Conference

Tuesday, April 1st, 2014

By Shaun Horton

The ASCH’s first joint international conference with the Ecclesiastical History Society begins this Thursday. There will not be an official live blog this time, but there is an online conference program for those who, like me, prefer mobile phones to printed paper. Scan the QR code to the right to see it on your phone or tablet. (If you need a bar code scanner, try searching your app store for “Redlaser.”) There is also some last minute conference information on Constant Contact, which will be incorporated into the online program soon.

It is not too late to register for a lower rate than you will pay at the registration desk. Register on churchhistory.org to register in dollars. If you prefer pounds, you can register through the EHS site. Churchhistory.org also has information on the conference hotel for anyone who still needs to book a room.

Finally, we would love to hear from anyone who winds up blogging about the conference. Just drop us a line. You might even try live blogging some of the events. (We use Coveritlive, but 24LiveBlog provides a nice, free alternative.) The trick is to listen carefully, and stop when your hands get tingly.

Blogging can be a great way to engage, reflect upon, and develop some of the ideas that get batted around during the panels and conversations over the course of several days. If you haven’t tried it, I recommend it.

Using Social Networks to Coordinate Conference Plans

Thursday, February 13th, 2014

by Shaun Horton

 
With the deadline for ASCH Winter Meeting submissions only one month away (and only two days left for joint proposals with the AHA), it is never too early to coordinate panel proposals and travel plans. It’s no secret that the ASCH strongly prefers session proposals to paper proposals.

This is where social media comes in handy. Aside from posting on H-Net, you can use Twitter feeds and hashtags like ASCH2015 or AHA2015 to make public calls for potential fellow panelists. But if you want a way to reach fellow Society members more directly (besides good old fashioned email), there is another option: closed (or private) network groups.

Not many members know this yet, but the ASCH maintains Facebook and LinkedIn groups just for members and conference-goers. These are places where members can coordinate and share information about panels, proposals, or travel plans. Anything posted here is visible to other members, but invisible to everyone else. Check them out, and feel free to submit a request to join.

Our LinkedIn subgroup: ASCH Members
Not to be confused with our public ASCH group, this group is open to Society members only, and you need a LinkedIn account to join. You do not have to be up to date on your dues to join this group. (Though really, you should be up to date on your dues.)

Our Facebook group: ASCH Panelists
This one is a little more relaxed in that you don’t have to be a Society member to join (but you still need a Facebook account). The group is intended for members, panelists, and potential panelists who plan to attend upcoming ASCH conferences – including those who are submitting proposals, but may not have purchased a membership yet. You can also invite fellow historians and scholars to join, without them having to seek out the group themselves or submit individual requests to a moderator.

Both groups are quite inactive at the moment because only a few people know about them. But it only takes a minute to sign up, and the more people join, the more useful they will be.

Are there other networks, tools, or methods you use to coordinate with other conference attendees? Let us know in the comments.

Everything Is Due Monday (An ASCH-EHS Update)

Saturday, January 18th, 2014

The final deadline for proposals for the Society’s joint international conference in Oxford is only two days away. The ASCH and Ecclesiastical History Society have accepted 65 proposals already, but they will take submissions until Monday, January 20, at 12 PM London time. The CFP, guidelines, and submission forms are available through the CFP link in the right side of this page (under Conferences), or on the Society’s Conferences & Meetings page.

The Society has travel funding available for some presenters. If you are an ASCH member, you can apply for a travel stipend by downloading this form (graduate students download this form instead), filling it out, and emailing it to keith.francis@churchhistory.org, along with a copy of your CV.

If your proposal has already been accepted, January 20 is also the deadline to register for the conference (which you can do here).

Call for Papers: ASCH-EHS 2014 Spring Conference

Tuesday, July 30th, 2013

 
[PDF Version]
 
Download Submission Form for Complete Sessions (docx)
Download Submission Form for Panels & Roundtables (docx)
Download Submission Form for Individual Papers (docx)
 
The American Society of Church History (ASCH) and the Ecclesiastical History Society in Britain (EHS) will be holding a special joint meeting, Thursday to Saturday, April 3-5, 2014, in Oxford, England.

The primary theme of the conference is Migration and Mission in Christian History. The program committee invites proposals for individual papers or full sessions on this theme. Papers could examine themes such as: Christianity in migrant communities in the early generations of re-settlement; missionary efforts directed towards non-Christian migrants or those from a different Christian tradition; or the migrations of missionaries themselves.

From the scattering of the Jerusalem Church in 70CE through the ‘barbarian’ invasions of the Roman Empire, the Anglo-Saxon and Viking settlements of England, and the migrations of the religious refugees in the Reformation era, to the Atlantic slave trade, the Irish, Scottish and European diasporas of the nineteenth century and the African and Asian ones of the twentieth, people movements have profoundly shaped the course of Christian history. They have disrupted religious commitments, forged new ones, and inspired and constrained mission. There is hence enormous scope for papers from all periods of Christian history.

The ASCH and EHS hope to produce an edited volume and/or special issue of Church History with papers from the conference that engage explicitly with the above theme. Individual paper proposals and proposals that are part of a session must relate to the above theme in order to be considered for publication.

The program committee also invites ASCH members, EHS members, and other interested scholars to submit session proposals on any aspect of the history of Christianity and its interaction with culture. These could include proposals for formal sessions, panel and round table discussions, consideration of a major recent book, critical assessments of a distinguished career, and other relevant themes and issues. Panels should exhibit diversity of gender, rank, and scholarly location in their composition: those bringing together scholars from both societies would be especially welcome.

Sessions will be two hours in length and should allow for three or four papers, a formal response, and Q&A with the audience.

There will be two deadlines for proposals: 21 October 2013 and 20 January 2014 (12 noon, London time). The earlier deadline will allow the program committee to make decisions by late November/early December 2013, to facilitate the booking of flights. It is possible that, if the program is already quite full, only a limited number of proposals submitted to the second deadline will be accepted.

Paper proposals should consist of:-
1) A short description of less than 300 words
2) A biographical paragraph or CV summary of the applicant
3) A current mailing location, e-mail address, and phone number for the proposed presenter.

Session proposals should contain all of the above for each of the presenters as well as:-
1) The session title
2) A brief description of less than 300 words outlining the theme or topic of the session
3) Biographical data and contact details for the chair and the respondent (which can be the same person)

The availability of audio-visual equipment cannot be guaranteed at this stage, but please indicate if you would like to use it if possible.

Please send proposals, by e-mail, to JohnWolffe-PA@open.ac.uk.

Further information about the conference will be available in due course on ASCH and EHS websites, and will be e-mailed to those whose proposals are accepted. The program committee reserves the right to reconfigure sessions as needed.

NOTE: All program participants must register for the conference and be members of the ASCH or EHS (which can offer temporary membership) at the time of the Meeting.

John Wolffe, President of the EHS and Program Chair
Bruce Hindmarsh, President of the ASCH

Download the Call for Papers [PDF]

Award Winning Research Essays

Wednesday, July 10th, 2013

The Journal of Ecclesiastical History has announced the winner of its first annual Eusebius Prize, which goes to the best submitted essay on any topic in early Christian history. This year’s winning paper is entitled “On the Diversity and Influence of the Eusebian Alliance: The Case of Theodore of Heraciea,” by Matthew J Crawford of the University of Durham. Cambridge University Press has made the prize-winning paper available online for free through September 30. You can read it here.

Also in prize-related news: the deadline for the Sidney Mead Prize has passed, but there is still time to submit nominations for the Jane Dempsey Douglass Prize. The Douglass Prize goes to the author of the best essay published during the previous calendar year on any aspect of the role of women in the history of Christianity. Nominations must be in by August 1.

To nominate an essay for the Douglass Prize, send a letter or an email to our Executive Secretary, Keith Francis (keith.francis@churchhistory.org) with

1) The author’s name
2) The author’s affiliation
3) The author’s contact information, and
4) The title of the essay

Last year’s winner was Sarah Adelman, whose essay “Empowerment and Submission: The Political Culture of Catholic Women’s Religious Communities in Nineteenth-Century America” appears in the Fall 2011 issue of the Journal of Women’s History.

ASCH Winter Meeting Recap

Monday, January 14th, 2013

by Shaun Horton

This year’s winter meeting of the American Society of Church History saw a lot of reflection on the Society’s beginnings, the changes it has undergone, and the direction it will take in the future. Laurie Maffly-Kipps’ address to the Society (which will appear in the forthcoming June issue of Church History) reflected on the historiographical shifts away from institutions that used to be so central to the study of “church history.” At our council and business meetings, members deliberated on how best to adapt to the “American Society’s” increasingly global reach. And as always, the panel presentations continued to the categories that church historians have used to make sense of things. Cara Burnidge has a succinct summary of Dr. Maffly-Kipp’s presidential address on the Religion in American West blog. You can also read Emily Clark’s thoughts on the ASCH Meeting over at Religion in American History Meanwhile, here is a brief recap of the first two days at ASCH.

I arrived Thursday afternoon in time for the conference’s first panel session, Restructuring Religion: American Approaches to Modernism, with John Corrigan, Elizabeth Clark, Amanda Porterfield, and Katie Lofton. This panel interrogated modernism as an analytical category by providing historical examples that offered new perspectives on modernism. John Corrigan presented several examples of how the self-understandings of modern religious communities can be explored in terms of space and place. The configuration of space, in the landscape, in architecture, and in communities’ relationships to each other, plays an important role in shaping group identity. One of the ways this confluence between space and identity has played out has been in the aversion to “negative,” or empty space. The process of building a collective identity that incorporated negative definitions of American Catholicism, for example, led to concerns that Catholics’ identity might become “hollow.”

 

The “horror vacui” (fear of emptiness) aesthetic at work in the Basilica of Our Lady of Victory. The artistic design fills all available space.

 

Elizabeth Clark discussed the contributions of George La Piana (1979-1971), the first Catholic to teach at Harvard Divinity School, to modernist thought. She highlighted La Piana’s emphasis on the Church as a social institution, influenced by cultural and economic forces, in contrast to the traditional Catholic portrayal of the Church as unchanging, and in contrast to Protestant historians’ emphasis on individual experience. Amanda Porterfield presented her interpretation of William James as a modern artist (rather than a modern scientist), whose Varieties of Religious Experience could be read as a “modernist collage” rather than a scientific study. By grouping disparate religious practices into categories of religious experience, James created a work that was driven more by aesthetic concerns than by scientific inquiry.

That afternoon, I caught Imagining God’s Kingdom: Supernatural Landscapes in Nineteenth-Century America, which was moderated by Leigh Schmidt. Caleb Maskell’s paper on Sylvester Graham argued for closer attention to Graham’s millennial eschatology. Graham’s dietary program, he argued, was part of a larger vision of the coming Kingdom of God as a kingdom of scientific knowledge about nature, including knowledge of the human body. Dana Logan discussed the construction of urban landscapes in antebellum spectator literature. Popular descriptions of the streets of antebellum New York condensed religious variety into a “panorama” that ameliorated Protestant anxieties over excessive religious variety by allowing them to experience it safely through literature. Sonia Hazard followed Logan’s paper by focusing on aesthetic changes in images of religious landscapes in nineteenth century textbooks. Hazard demonstrated how changes in printing technology led to changes in the aesthetics of these images, which in turn affected how views of nature were mediated. “Nature,” she said, “was in the machine.”

 

Tracts produced with wood engravings, for example, resulted in small images that were fully integrated with the text. Later developments in orthography produced larger, more autonomous images.

 

Brett Grainger’s paper examined nature mysticism among early American methodist preachers. More than simply a backdrop for religious experience, nature was itself an object of contemplation that resonated with the spiritual journeys of methodist writers. Leigh Schmidt’s response to the panel pressed each of the authors on the particular conclusions they drew, but also challenged them to think about the connections between each other’s papers on the role of landscapes in religious practice.

That evening, I sat in on the Society Council meeting. Much of the discussion was dedicated to the Society’s growth on the global stage, and how best to direct its resources in light of this growth. The treasurer’s report highlighted a substantial budget surplus, and recommended new putting procedures in place to make sure it is spent wisely. The editors of Church History reported that the journal has been doing well financially, and that its readership has expanded, particularly in Africa and Asia. All this led to some discussion on the issue of branding the American Society of Church History. Much of that discussion has been (and still is) ongoing, but the council did decide to begin a relationship with the Ecclesiastical History Society in the UK, which may include sharing information and calls for papers between the societies. The possibility of joint conferences in the future also came up.

Finally, we heard about the Society’s endowment campaign, which kicked off that weekend, to raise funds to support graduate students’ research endeavors. Charles Lippy has been soliciting donations, and hopes to raise $50,000. (If you want to contribute, you can do so from the Membership section of the Society web site. The official reports for the meeting should be online eventually as well.

The Friday morning panel I attended was called Anti-Jesuit Rhetoric in the Early Modern Francophone World, and was chaired by Daniella Kostroun. The panelists discussed the relationship between anti-Jesuit rhetoric and the expulsion of the Jesuits from France in 1764. John McCormack described portrayals of the French Jesuits surrounding their receptin of King Henry IV’s heart after his assassination. While sources sympathetic to the Jesuits played up their emotional lamentations over his death, the Jesuits’ detractors accused them of regicide and duplicity. Joseph Wachtel provided a history of the events leading up to the collapse of the French mission at Port Royal in 1612. Struggles over financing and jurisdiction between the Jesuits, their supporters, and the other colonists at Port Royal were framed within, and exacerbated by, Gallican portrayals of the Jesuits as disloyal, avaricious and motivated by the pursuit of power.

Daniel Watkins shifted the focus to the eighteenth century with the anti-Jesuit deployment of Isaac-Joseph Berruyer as a symbol of the Jesuits’ alleged heresies. A Jesuit historian, Berruyer published the first two volumes of his A History of the People of God to much criticism and condemnation. His second volume in particular was seen as a distasteful depiction of sacred history, incorporating contemporary sensibilities into his descriptions of Biblical events. His third volume, which seemed to emphasize Christ’s humanity over his divinity, was especially odious to his detractors, and as it was published while he was dying, the Jesuits were blamed for promoting Berruyer’s heretical views. According to Watkins, Berruyer became central to anti-Jesuits’ arguments for condemnation and the dissolution of the Jesuits – despite the Jesuits’ own disavowal of his works.

Scott Sunquist chaired a session called To Whom Does Christianity Belong, with papers on the intersection of religious and national identity in India, Brazil and Nigeria. Dyron Daughrity argued for the “Indianness of Christianity.” Indian Christians, he claimed, must work against their marginalization in India by making the case that their Christian practices were fully Indian rather than a western import. Todd Hartch demonstrated that the success of the Universal Church’s missionary efforts was marked more by the church’s assertion of its Brazilian identity than by any attempt at enculturation. Instead, the church’s appeal lay in its apparent spiritual power, and its attention to the concerns of the communities it encountered. Corey Williams examined the growth of Christianity in Nigeria as a result of its appropriation from its European roots by Nigerian natives. Christianity, Williams argued, is losing its distinctly European identity, and it gaining ground because of its “in-built capacity to belong everywhere, to everyone.” In his response, Scott Sunquist remarked upon the way “multiple layers” of Christian missions become more indigenous (and less western) as they accumulate. Older, more western forms of Christianity are not displaced by the emergence of more indigenous forms, but they do have to respond to them. Dr. Sunquist also suggested that future studies of global Christianity may have to pay attention to aspects of religious practice that have formerly received little attention, like the role of dreams in African practice.

At the 125th Anniversary luncheon, four speakers reflected on the Society’s past, and on its possibilities for the future. Peter Williams became a member of the ASCH when Sidney Ahlstrom passed out membership forms in class during the 1960s, and has been a member ever since. Dr. Williams commented on the Society’s “spirit of communitas” that made conferences welcoming to graduate students. “At the time I’m not sure I realized how remarkable this was,” he said, “how wonderful this was.” Barbara Brown Zikmund also remarked upon the Society’s hospitality to graduate students, but recalled that it had not always been reflected in Society policy as much as it is today. When Dr. Zikmund joined in 1965, graduate students were not allowed to present papers. While individual scholars were friendly to grad students, there was no system of hospitality or aid to graduate students as would later develop. The most biggest change in ASCH since then, said Zikmund, was the growth of WITCH – Women In Theology and Church History, a group formed for women to meet informally and to network. Many collaborative projects, she said, would never have started were it not for WITCH.

Barbara Brown Zikmund and Elizabeth Clark both discussed ways that the study of church history has evolved. “When I got there, it was a bunch of old, white, Protestant men,” said Zikmund. By contrast, 46% of ASCH presentations today are given by women, and the Society has a rule that its panels are to be mixed-gender. Dr. Clark described how, in the early days of the ASCH, church history was much more parochial, a society of American male church historians whose work tended to focus on continuity and consensus within ecclesiastical institutions. Since then, the ASCH has become a global, multidisciplinary organization, producing scholarship that is more self-aware, and that is more attuned to diversity and difference in the history of Christianity. “We have learned that there is no politically innocent history,” said Clark. Finally, John Fitzmier, Executive Director of the AAR, spoke on the ASCH’s relationship with the AAR and the AHA. He suggested that cooperative alliances with other societies could help the ASCH to tackle various issues facing scholars today. One example, he said, was the AHA’s endeavor to address the difficulties of the academic job market by encouraging graduate programs to prepare students for a broader range of jobs in the field of history.

After the luncheon, Ruth Compton Brouwer chaired a panel with Marguerite Van Die, Mark McGowan, and Mark Noll on comparative histories of Christianity in the US and Canada. Dr. Van Die called for more attention to diversity and variegation in Canadian church history, highlighting how its conventional emphasis on unity and inclusiveness has often belied Canadians’ own preoccupations with religious disunity. Mark McGowan’s presentation discussed the ambiguous relationship between Canadian Catholics and the state. As a constitutionally protected religious minority, Canadian Catholics were able to “finesse the state” on certain issues like school funding and religious broadcasting. To the extent that the separation of church and state had ever truly existed in Canada, McGowan argued, formal separation was confounded by the complexity of the church state relationship. Mark Noll called for more comparative studies of church history in Canada and the US. One way forward this area, he suggested, is to think of the US and Canada as liberal societies whose liberalism has been pushed in different directions by their contingent circumstances. Other possible factors for comparison came up in the panel discussion, including the role of region, migration, and the differences in global political power between Canada and the US.

One of the great things about the ASCH conference is that, after a dizzying array of panels and meetings, its members know how to unwind. Chuck Lippy took me and several of my fellow grads out for crab ravioli, gumbo, bread pudding, and good conversation. We talked about our research and the market. He told us about his experiences as a young scholar in the Society, and gave us some advice on the job search from his perspective as a former professor. I also learned what bread pudding is.

 

Anne Blue-Siegler

Pictures cannot adequately convey what bread pudding is.

 

This is something senior scholars at the ASCH meeting do as part of the spirit of communitas that Peter Williams mentioned. That alone is worth the registration. It was a promising start to an eventful weekend.

Expanding Church History Online

Thursday, July 26th, 2012

Online collaboration and feedback has a lot of potential to improve the traditional publication process. To that end, Church History is proposing new enhancements to its print content.
 
 
 
New Feature
Did an essay in Church History stir your thoughts? ASCH members may send a review of a Church History essay for online publication, along with a current cv, to the blog at sdhorton@fsu.edu.
 
 
Your Opinion Please
Do you think online peer reviews of essays submitted to Church History is a good idea? With authors’ permissions, essays considered by the editors as candidates for peer review would appear online, perhaps along with specialist reports solicited by the editors. Further review would be open online to Society members, with comments posted along with reviewers’ cvs.

Call For Papers: ASCH 2013 Winter Conference

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

The annual Winter 2013 meeting of the American Society of Church History (ASCH) will be held Thursday to Sunday, January 3-6, 2013, in New Orleans, in conjunction with the annual meeting of the American Historical Association (AHA).

We invite ASCH members and other interested scholars to submit paper and session proposals on any aspect of the history of Christianity and its interaction with culture, including proposals for formal papers, panel and round table discussions, consideration of a major recent book, critical assessments of a distinguished career, and other relevant themes and issues.

In addition to traditional categories relating to periods, geographical areas, and special topics, we will give special consideration to proposals that consider broader themes across periods or regions; engage in interdisciplinary discussion; place theological ideas in historical context; examine particular genres, source materials or methods; or treat the current state of the study of church history.

We also invite sessions that deal with pedagogical issues of concern in the teaching of the history of Christianity, or with issues in the publication and dissemination of research to specialist and general audiences. Panels should exhibit diversity of gender, rank, and scholarly location in their composition.

Proposals for entire panels/sessions are strongly preferred, though proposals for individual papers will also be considered. The committee welcomes international participation and particularly encourages proposals (whether for full panels or individual papers) from those who live and work outside the United States.

Sessions are typically two hours in length and allow for three or four papers, a formal response, and Q&A with the audience. In order better to group individual papers into sessions, such proposals for individual papers should address one of the following themes:

Christianity and public life, or the relationship of church and state
Christian responses to disaster and suffering
Christianity and race, or creole cultures

The deadline for proposals is March 15, 2012.

(For those interested in submitting joint proposals to the AHA and the ASCH, the deadline for AHA proposals is February 15, 2012. (See www.historians.org.) Paper proposals should consist of:

(1) a short description of less than 300 words
(2) a biographical paragraph or CV summary of the applicant, and
(3) a current mailing location, email address, and phone number for the proposed presenter.

Session proposals should contain all of the above for each of the presenters, as well as:


(1) the session title
(2) a brief description of less than 300 words outlining the theme or topic of the session, and
(3) biographical data and contact details for the chair and the respondent (which can be the same person).

Use of audio-visual equipment is limited to the hotel provider’s equipment, has become very expensive, and must be restricted to presentations for which it is strictly necessary. The proposed use of computers, internet, or projectors in the session must therefore be stated and rationalized in the proposal.

Please send proposals, preferably by email, before March 15, 2012, to the program committee at asch2013@regent-college.edu. Acknowledgements and further information will be sent out as proposals are received. The program committee reserves the right to reconfigure sessions as needed.

NOTE: All program participants must register for the annual meeting and be members of the ASCH at the time of the Meeting.

Download this announcement (PDF)

Useful History

Wednesday, January 11th, 2012

by James Lewis

Reading Richard Heitzenrater’s presidential address in the December 2011 issue of Church History (terrific on the page and no doubt even better in person) made me wonder about the apparently modest interest in American church history in seminaries and among clergy.He reminds us that all historians employ “research, conjecture, and analysis” as their basic tools in producing an account of historic developments that is “credible, appropriate, and useful.” (It’s the criterion of usefulness I want to highlight in these brief reflections.) He also acknowledges that many ASCH members pursue their craft for perfectly appropriate personal and professional motives that have little to do with contemporary churches or their theological schools.

My question, however, writing from a seminary campus, is why American church history seems so useless (or at least marginal) to many clergy and theological students. Among other possible explanations, some claim that attention to Bible, theology, and pastoral care are more directly relevant to pastoral ministry, leaving history aside as an unnecessary luxury in a crowded curriculum.

But, to put the onus on us, perhaps some of the blame is ours. Perhaps, in Heitzenrater’s terms, American church historians have been more professionally comfortable with the tasks of research and conjecture but far more timid about offering the kind of analysis that can be genuinely useful to pastors and churches alike.

That’s not to say, of course, that claims aren’t made all the time in church and seminary about “what history teaches us”. But those claims are all too often made without the benefit of legitimate historical evidence. For that kind of history lesson, anything will do. But maybe it’s time for church historians to think more seriously about and to argue more boldly for the genuine usefulness of church history outside the classroom.

In doing so, however, we must remind ourselves and our students that our historical accounts can only be useful when grounded in appropriately rigorous research and conjecture. Only thus can we produce narratives of the past that are both credible and appropriate as well as useful to the church in the present. For pastors and church leaders, that kind of church history is “news they can use.”

Winter Meeting Live Blog

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

Click here to follow our live blog, post comments and get updates as they happen

 
 
Subscribe to our live blog's RSS feed Subscribe to our live blog

Our official live blog for the 2012 Annual Winter Meeting will begin updating at 3pm Thursday, January 5, and will cover the meeting until Sunday at 1pm.